College Media Network

Pandora’s cabinet?

Paul Thompson

Opinions Editor

Print this article

Published: Monday, November 24, 2008

Updated: Monday, November 24, 2008

I certainly had an interesting time watching Barack Obama fill many of his cabinet positions last week. To say that I was surprised would be — perhaps — the understatement of the year.


Already, despite his probably false messages of “hope” and “change” for America, Obama has wormed his way in with the biggest Washington insiders in the country. His cabinet might as well be a who’s who of Democratic Party elites.


Just look at his choices for these positions. (All taken from reports on FoxNews.)
Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State; Bill Richardson, Secretary of Commerce; Tom Daschle, Secretary of Health and Human Services; Eric Holder, Attorney General; Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security; and Rahm Emmanuel, White House Chief of Staff.


See what I mean? None of these people are real “outsiders” like Obama branded himself during his campaign. I mean, I’m not asking Obama to pick Republicans for his cabinet — I’m not even asking him to pick one, even though that would bode well for the country — but I am questioning if he is keeping his campaign promises to those who voted for him.


Just look at these folks, surely I’m not the only one to have noticed this.


Take Hillary, for example. What on earth does she know about being the President’s chief foreign officer? She may have traveled, and she was First Lady for a few years, but those are hardly qualifications, especially to succeed someone so talented and capable as Doctor Condaleezza Rice. In case you were unaware, Rice is a PhD of international relations. Can Hillary claim anything like that?


Obviously not. That choice speaks volumes about Obama, though.


Look further; Bill Richardson, Obama’s Secretary of Commerce. Richardson has no relevant experience in “promoting American business interests abroad” as the Associated Press defines his new position. Richardson has never even been a businessman. Guess who he’ll be succeeding — Carlos Gutierrez, a man who worked his way from the bottom up to the President and CEO’s office of Kellogg.


Starting to notice a pattern here? I am.


Take Tom Daschle. Arguably one of the most liberal members of the Democratic Party, Daschle spent many years in Congress working on committees like the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry. How close is that to Health and Human Services? Well, for Obama, that’s just as tangentially close as the rest of his future cabinet members’ previous careers, and therefore good enough.


Look even further down the roll at Eric Holder, who was Deputy AG during the Clinton years, and was instrumental in securing the Bill Clinton pardon of Marc Rich.


Rich, who is not an American citizen, was indicted by then-US Attorney Rudy Giuliani in 1983 on charges of tax evasion and illegal trading with Iran.


On Bill Clinton's last day as President, he pardoned Rich, citing Holder as a primary reason for doing so.


I thought Democrats liked taxes, so what happened? Rich was a wealthy man who would not pay his taxes, (ignoring his unscrupulous trading activities) why not let the indictment stand?


I'll tell you why.


Marc Rich appeals to liberals like Bill Clinton, Eric Holder and — apparently, by association — Barack Obama.


Rich is a coward, a fugitive, a criminal and an associate of Iran (all qualities that Democrats revere.) That must be why Clinton acceded to Holder's demand for a pardon for his “hero” of sorts.


The current Governor of Arizona, Janet Napolitano, actually opposes building a boarder fence in her state in order to protect her state, as well as the rest of the country. Even according to CNN exit polls, voters trusted John McCain to protect the country more than Obama, and now he chooses someone who refuses to protect her own state? Besides, it isn’t like she has any experience with terrorism or national security.


I know I’ll be sleeping more soundly. Thanks Barack.


You know, or not.


Look, the point I’m trying to make here is that Obama is not keeping his promised to those of you who were duped into voting for him. I don’t want Obama to pick a bi-partisan cabinet, and I’m not asking him to. He should do what he thinks is best, but I’m here to tell you, and you can quote me on this one, his “vision” is not the right one.


This isn’t over just yet.


Paul Thompson is the opinions editor of The Crimson White. His column regularly runs on Fridays.

Comments

6 comments
Raleigh Hill
Sat Dec 6 2008 03:14
Oh Please,

When I comment on an article I use my "vast, liberal Rhodes Scholar brain" to voice my opinion on a given issue, right or wrong. You simply respond to every article, and every comment on an article, by attacking "leftist" posters (really... anyone else reminded of the "maverick" buzzword type speech of the GOP? lol. How many times can you work in the term "leftist" per post haha) as idiots. On THIS post you actually made a pre-emptive "leftist" strike. No one had even COMMENTED! I disagree with Thompson (strongly) and I in at least some way try to explain why. The point that I was making was that Obama is putting into place a staff that is qualified and well respected. And yes, very liberal. But most importantly intelligient. No, I do not on hand have a list of all of their qalifications and degrees, and thus can not vouch for their ownership of PhD's. But compared to Bush, I am pretty sure we can all agree they all seem like Rhodes Scholars, as you so eloquently put. You sir, (not that I would know your name "Oh Really") are a very angry, dissapointed person. I wish you the best.

Oh Please
Tue Dec 2 2008 12:07
.

Sure, Raleigh... how surprising that Obama's "change" is made up of the cream of the liberal crop. What a breaking ball that was... I'm sure they represent the finest intelligence the political machine has to offer, being leftists and all. Being a liberal does automatically make you a PhD, doesn't it?

Also, Palin's gaffes made me feel the same way that Obama's gaffes and Biden's gaffes made me feel: awkward.

Anyway, Raleigh, go ahead and use your vast, liberal Rhodes Scholar brain and tell me how Obama's team of Europe-huggers is going to bring about this mighty change.

Raleigh Hill
Sun Nov 30 2008 18:00
"Janet Napolitano, actually opposes building a boarder fence in her state in order to protect her state, as well as the rest of the country."

That this could get published is beyond me. You use the term "actually" as if the statement is grounded in some rock solid foundation of rightness. Like for instance, "that person x actually thinks 9/11 was a good thing... blah blah... is bad" See the difference? That statement is pretty solidly agreed upon. Paul Thompson... I am simply more and more at a loss for words on you. It is glaringly obvious that Barack Obama could in fact be the reincarnation of Jesus, Ghandi, Mother Theresa, and Abraham Lincoln and you would still disagree with his every move, and oppose his every decision. You are part of the hopeless right that helped ASSURE McCain had no chance at a national victory.

And to address "Oh Please", the "change" Obama has promised is putting the smartest, most qualified person in each position, as best determined by him. You remember what it was like having an intelligient president right? One the rest of the world actually respected when he spoke/stammered? It's such a brave new world now that we have a president who you feel is smarter than yourself. But then, you probably also thought that Palin's gaffes made her "down to earth" and "likeable". As opposed to just making her sound stupid.

Mark Andrews
Mon Nov 24 2008 21:13
Still the president.
Crimson_White,HBmudgett@gmail.com
Mon Nov 24 2008 14:17
Not sure why I'm going to comment on this one, rather than the other multiple travesties of thought that were far worse than this, but oh well. Also, not a big fan of the choice for Hillary, either, I'll stand with you on that one. But...

Your way of making points is weak. You sprinkle in your own opinions and it just weakens an otherwise solid piece. Calling Marc Rich a "coward" before listing off things that could probably be more universally agreed upon? Doesn't do a lot to add to your already incredibly horrible reputation as the worst, most slanted, obnoxious writer that this paper has (did I mention your also a festering ass boil to the English language as well, with the way you write week in and week out? But that's another issue). Saying that Janet Napolitano refuses to "protect her own state" because she won't build a border fence? Please. Purely opinion. Your for fencing off whatever dream of suburban America Mommy and Daddy and Reverend Lovejoy taught you, and that's fine. But its also your opinion.

Oh Please
Mon Nov 24 2008 10:34
.

I'm sure this column will be bombarded by the college left as always, but it is absolutely the most relevant and true political article that has been written about Obama in this newspaper to date.

The leftist posters will come at this article by attacking Paul's judgement of each cabinet member's qualities and experience, but none will be able to debunk the fact that this is not the "change" Obama campaigned on. The only "change" we're seeing is the swapping of the White House from one old group of insiders to the other old group of insiders, and that tends to happen in the presidency from time to time. The only real "change" here is the color of Obama's skin.

Log in Log in to be able to post comments.